Greetings

Welcome! random thoughts and opinions on the current events shaping the logistics and transportation industry.

If you are interested in additional information concerning any blog entries or any other topic and/or if you would like to contribute an article to the blog, please email me at croberson@transportintelligence.com

Currently reading the book "Logistics Clusters" by Dr. Yossi Sheffi. Join the Twitter book chat. This week we are discussing Chapters 5-7. Please use #logcluster_3 when posting thoughts on Twitter. Weekly recaps of the Twitter chats will be posted here on the blog. Thanks and looking forward to your thoughts!

For additional news and thoughts, connect with me on LinkedIn and Twitter.



Tuesday, May 21, 2013

After refusing a YRC takeover, ABF and Teamsters agree on new contract


A negotiated Teamsters union contract will be voted on by ABF Freight’s 7,500 members throughout the month of June. Pending its approval, union members will accept an automatic 7% decrease in wages but will be recovered by the 5th year of the contract.  Union officials also granted the company flexibility to use non-union, outside carriers. According to ABF, this concession was needed because new business opportunities have been lost to non-union competitors.

A Teamster representative noted “Nobody ever wants to see a pay cut but in light of the company’s struggles and our desire to see the company survive, something needed to be done. It is in our best interests, as well as ABF’s that this company is given a chance to climb out of this deep recession so that our members’ futures are protected”.

Indeed it appears troubles at ABF resulted in a rebuffed buyout opportunity from YRC in April while in the midst of contract negotiations with the Teamsters.  According to Mr. Welch, CEO of YRC, “We saw this as an opportunity to improve the density at YRC Freight. Our network has the capacity to handle more shipments. I think an acquisition makes sense.” Welch also said the attempted acquisition speaks to the financial strength of YRC. He said the company would have been able to secure the financing if the two firms had pursued the deal. An interesting statement from a company, that not too long ago, teetered on the brink of financial disaster and has quite a bit of debt on its books.  Not too surprising, the Teamsters Union which has a financial stake in YRC including a seat on the company’s board of directors, was none too pleased with a possible merger. Teamsters President, James Hoffa said “Before YRC begins looking for acquisition targets they should first restore our members’ wages and pension contributions. We have seen this kind of arrogance from YRC before. We thought they had finally learned the lessons of past management catastrophes. Unfortunately it appears they have not.”

YRC, itself, just recently received approval from the Teamsters to undergo its network optimization plan which calls for consolidating 29 terminals into existing terminals and closing three distribution centers, along with several other changes to YRC’s network.

Meanwhile, ABF’s lawsuit with YRC continues. Arkansas Best alleges that wage deals between the Teamsters and YRC violated the National Master Freight Agreement (NMFA). The NMFA, implemented in 2008, was designed to create equal labor costs and other benefit payments among trucking companies with drivers represented by the Teamsters.

The lawsuit, first filed in 2010, was dismissed a second time by the U.S. District Court. In late 2012, Arkansas Best appealed the case again to the United States Court of Appeals. The Circuit has once appealed in favor of Arkansas Best.

So, as a lawsuit hangs over YRC and ABF as well as both work towards profitability, non-union less-than-truckload (LTL) companies such as Old Dominion are  taking market share, increasing tonnage and posting record financial results.

The trucking industry is adapting to the current environment where flexibility is vital and as such unions find themselves having to adapt as well. For how long unions will be receptive to this need remains to be seen but in order for them to survive as well, flexibility is just as important.

Monday, May 20, 2013

Book Chat Update - Week 2


This past week was a bit slow. I must confess, it was a busy week for me and proved difficult in keeping up with my reading assignment! As such, I’d like to include Chapter 5 along with Chapters 6 and 7 for this week’s chat.

For this week, please include #logcluster_3 when posting thoughts. Feel free to throw out any thoughts, links to websites etc.

If you’d like to comment on the previous chapters, again, feel free to do so either on Twitter or on the blog.

My thanks to @MITesd for retweeting posts!

A few posts from this past week include the follow:

·        Chapter 4 covered operational advantages of logistics clusters. How can transport be an operational advantage? How can warehousing/distribution be an operational advantage?

·        How can reverse logistics benefit from logistics clusters?

·        CO (consolidated operations) carrier hubs seem to be natural locations for logistics clusters to develop. Carriers such as FedEx, DHL and UPS all seem to benefit. What are other pluses?

·        Ports, airports, rail/intermodal hubs are also locations for logistics clusters to develop. Thoughts?

Articles of interest:


The expansion of the Panama Canal has resulted in many Caribbean islands, particular Cuba, Dominican Republic and Jamaica to create plans for logistics hubs. Investments are underway to improve infrastructure – roads, airports and expansion of ports.


The White House announced that it will coordinate three competitions for teams across the U.S. to win a combined $200 million to develop manufacturing innovation hubs. The competition comes on the heels of the government’s successful pilot program of the innovation hub model in Youngstown, Ohio. The process of additive manufacturing, which is the technical term for 3-D printing, is being developed in Youngstown to help advance the understanding and use of this new technology in the U.S.

Wednesday, May 15, 2013

Slight improvements in freight forwarding market

As noted from first quarterly earnings reports, there was slight improvement in the freight forwarding market. A mixed bag as some forwarders reported positive gains, while others noted declines. Overall, the airfreight market continues to plague freight forwarders as shifts to ocean freight services continue.

Ocean freight revenue increased for DHL, Expeditors and Kuehne + Nagel, 4.5%, 2.5% and 8.5% respectively however, gross profit declined 1.8% for DHL and increased 1.3% for Kuehne + Nagel.  Meanwhile, air freight revenue declined for DHL and Expeditors, 8.2% and 3.0% respectively. Airfreight gross profit declined 8.9% for DHL. Panalpina reported for its Americas region, gross profits increased 4.6% thanks to “strong trade flows on the transpacific lane”.

Rate volatility continued as capacity remained an issue. DHL noted declines in airfreight demand in the high tech and engineering and manufacturing industries. Panalpina also noted declines in demand from the high tech industry as well as the chemicals industry. There were some gains within the airfreight market. For example, Panalpina reported “double-digit” volume growth in the consumer and retail, healthcare and oil and gas industries whereas Kuehne + Nagel “increased market share” in the pharmaceutical, perishables and aviation industries. Still, overall airfreight volumes declined for DHL      (-5.9%), Panalpina (-3.0%) and Kuehne + Nagel (-2.0%). Expeditors noted a slight increase, thanks to a 16% increase in January; however, the company ended the quarter with a 0.4% increase in airfreight volumes.

Despite an overall decline in volumes, Panalpina’s Americas region recorded a 5.0% increase in airfreight volumes. The Americas region makes up 24% of the company’s total airfreight volumes and was the only region to report a gain. Meanwhile, Kuehne + Nagel’s Americas region reported no change in volume.

Stagnation appears to be the best description for the overall ocean freight market. DHL noted volumes stagnated on east-west tradelanes while Kuehne + Nagel noted stagnation throughout the ocean freight market. Overcapacity and volatile rates remain issues with this market.  

By volume, DHL, Panalpina and Kuehne + Nagel recorded gains in overall ocean freight volume. DHL volumes increased 2.1%, Panalpina volumes increased 7.0%, a first quarter volume record for the company and Kuehne + Nagel reported a 2.3% volume increase. Expeditors, however, reported a 4% decline noting monthly declines throughout the quarter.

For the Americas region, Panalpina reported a 3.0% increase in volume while Kuehne + Nagel reported a 4.0% increase in volume for its Americas region.

The outlook for the freight forwarding market remains questionable. The need to right-size capacity and stabilize rates are needed as well as improvement in the global economy to stimulate demand. Still, it appears the Americas region was a bright spot for several freight forwarders.